| |
1. Economic Profile of Japan
1.1 Population of Japan
Japan covers an area of 378,000 sq km, has a population of
120,000,000 in 2002, as the eighth largest country in the
world and while having a population density of 339 people
per sq km, the largest in the whole world in this respect.
The distribution of population in Japan reveals a large difference
among regions, with 8 capitals/circuits/prefectures/counties
having population exceeding 5 million respectively. Of all
676 cities in Japan in 2000, 11 have population over 1 million.
Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya form the so-called "Three Mega-Metropolis
Circles", and population in the range of 50 km of these
three circles accounts for 44% of national total. Viewing
from the distribution among industries, population in the
primary, secondary and tertiary industries accounts for 5.3%,
31.5% and 63.2% respectively of national total in 1998.
1.2 A Survey of Japan's Economic Development
Through all the arduous efforts of ten years from 1949 to
1955, Japan's economic situation restored to the pre-war
level from runs of the World War II. Japan's economy experienced
drastic development at a rate of 10% in the 1960s and entered
a high-speed growth period. In the 1970s and 1980s, Japan's
economy witnessed a period of steady growth at an average
growth rate of 5%, and developed by leaps and bounds, enabling
Japan to rank among the world advanced countries while having
become the second largest economic power next to the USA.
From the end of the 1980s to the early 1990s. "bubble
economy" occurred in Japan as a result of overheated
economic growth. The "bubble economy" collapsed
in early 1990s and the economy entered into a sustained
decline. The economic growth rate in Japan for the years
1992,1993 and 1994 was 0.4%, 0.5% and 0.6% respectively.
The years 1995 and 1996 enjoyed a growth rate of 3% and
3.6% respectively, marking a brief economic recovery. Then
a decrease of 0.1% appeared in 1997 and 1.9% in 1998. The
GNP in Japan in 1999 was Yen 494 trillion, an increase of
0.5% over the preceding year and the government pre-estimated
target of 0.6% was basically achieved, an sign of economic
improvement. The economic growth rate reached 1.2% in 2000,
however, the pace of growing slowed down since 2001.
1.3 Development of Major Industries in
Japan
1.3.1 Significant gaps of development among different industries.
Viewing from industrial categorization:
The primary industry has further contracted. The comprehensive
output index of agriculture, forestry and aquatic product
sectors has decreased year by year. The output of major
agricultural products has glided drastically, with the exception
of rice, eggs, beef and milk, which have enjoyed a stable
situation. The market of agricultural products in Japan
has been increasingly opened up over the recent years, and
Japanese agricultural products have experienced more and
more significant impact from low-priced foreign products
of the like.
Most sectors of the secondary industry are in stagnation,
with only a few exhibiting a tendency of increase.
Japan is not rich in mineral resources, and its mining sector
has registered a declining one. The mining and manufacturing
sectors have presented lower output index than the datum
reference (1995=100) in all period except in 1996, which
witnessed a brief coming with output index exceeding 140.
An investigation made in 2000 by the Ministry of Industries
concerning 15 categories of products in the manufacturing
sectors has shown that 9 categories of industries such as
general machinery and textiles exhibit a tendency of slow-down
while 6 categories including electronic machinery and chemical
industry are beginning to upturn. As for commodity series,
influenced by counter-cyclical policies, the capital products,
building and construction goods, durable and non-durable
consumables have seen a slow gradual upturn in demand, while
both the demand and supply of information associate products
(such as fax machine, cellular phone, pager and PC) are
on the rise.
The tertiary industry, especially information associated
service sectors is rapidly developing, with a high growth
rate both in output and in the number of employees, and
can be regarded as the "ocomotive industry" to
drive the economic growth.
1.3.2 Polarization of the industrial structure
The existing traditional industries have come to maturity,
lacking new breakthrough of growth but with heavy debt burdens.
Though new leading industries have not yet taken shaped,
IT related new industries such as information, communications,
electronics and software are experiencing rapid growth.
The maturity of industrial structure is characterized by
the saturation of products on domestic market, and standardization
and maturity of technology, as is the case with iron and
steel, petrochemical, auto, household appliances and machinery
industries. For such an export-oriented country as Japan,
the maturity of industrial structure is also characterized
by a trend of export decrease in leading industries and
the fact that the competitive edge has narrowed or become
unclear. Further import will impose pressure on the domestic
industries and the overseas production ratio of leading
industries will rise progressively (see the Table), In order
to seek now comparative edge, traditional industries of
Japan have continued to transfer to Asia, and both the ratio
of overseas equipment investment and the value of re-import
have continued to rise; on the other hand, 80% of the value
of re-import comes from Asia.
As "ulti-peak type" industry
groups, new leading industries meet the requirement of the
national conditions of Japan, although these new industries
have not risen to play a leading role. Nevertheless, as
with the increase of IT and R&D investment, a new "third
wave" industry with competitive edge is taking shape
in Japan, in which Japan has been expert. It caters to the
consumption demand of the information age and will have
a wide range of prospects. Information & communications
and biological industries are also new high-tech industries
which have incorporated energetic development. It has become
a basic strategy for developed countries which attempt to
take the lead in finance and economy, including Japan, to
promote global financial and economic development by means
of the Internet revolution. As traditional industries are
continuously infiltrating into new fields, such important
industries as the information and financial industries are
becoming integrated into each other. At the G8 Kyushu Okinawa
Summit, which closed in August, the network and IT revolutions,
were for the first time linked with finance and debt issues.
In the strategy for industrial restructuring in 2000, Japanese
enterprises took the IT industry as their first-choice objective
on after another, and involved themselves in the information
network and high-tech industries, aiming at becoming leading
enterprises in the new industry. Many traditional comprehensive
business firms have started to take part in the competition
in high-tech industries such as IT, communications and electronics.
The magnificent prospects of the information industry not
only have attracted traditional industries but also are
progressively changing the orientation and pace of financial
investment and restructuring. The information industry enjoys
a larger investment expectancy and a higher ratio of return
on investment in comparison with the weak manufacturing
and other traditional industries. Therefore, investing in
the information industry has currently become an important
decision-making orientation of major banks in Japan. Take
Kangyo-Fuji-Industrial Bank, which ranks the first among
the top four financial groups in Japan. Although it is the
bank with the largest amount of bad debt in Japan (the balance
of bad debt reaching up to Yen 4.7388 trillion), its investment
in the information industry has exceeded Yen 150 billion,
making it the first among Japanese banks and the fourth
worldwide in this regard.
1.4 Status of Japan's Information Industry
Japan is the world's second largest market for IT next to
the USA, with the extent of development of IT and its products
and their market share second only to those of the USA.
The USA ranks the first worldwide in respect of computer
sophisticated technology, and Japan follows next. The USA
monopolizes the three fields of database, chips and operating
systems, and its network products possess significant competitive
edge. On the other hand, Japan holds a leading position
in the data compression, image and notebook computer display
technologies, and growth of the information industry has
imposed a positive effect on the development of the whole
economy in Japan. The output of the information industry
has played a leading role in the overall industrial output
in Japan.
The information industry has become the largest industry
in Japan. From 1993 to 1996, the average annual growth rate
of the information industry was 6.4%, far above the average
1.68% of all industries during the same period. The total
output of Japan's information industry reached Yen 103.3
trillion in 1996, accounting for 11.4% of the total output
of all industries. The information industry has become the
locomotive of economic development.
The investment in the information industry has played an
important role in its contribution to the national economy
and has given an impetus to the development of related industries.
In 1996, investment in the information industry contributed
15.4% to the actual domestic production growth rate, that
is, a share of 0.6 percentage points to the 3.9 percentage
points of GNP growth, much higher than that of any other
industry. From 1990 to 1996, production in the information
and communication industry imposed an effect of Yen 30 trillion,
of which the information and communication industry played
a role of 50.9% and imposed an effect of 16.4%
1.5 Features and Evaluation of Japan's
Current Overall Economic Development
15.1 Japanese economy is currently weak in recovery and
the situation very grim.
The post-war economy in Japan has experienced more than
ten cycles, and each economic cycle from booming to recession
has its own characteristics. The current cycle is characterized
by a lack of strength in recovery and no occurrence of booming
stage before entering into recession. The previous economic
recession, which was the first one during the Heisei period,
occurred between April 1997 and April 1999, lasting a total
of 25 months. The booming phase occurred in 1996, and the
very year witnessed an economic growth rate as high as 5%.
The recovery phase lasted from November 1993 to the end
of 1995, during which the annual economic growth rate did
not reach 1% for several successive years, which was one
with the slowest, longest and weakest recovery of all cycles,
so to speak. Furthermore, the booming phase that followed
was also one with the least feeling of booming of all. The
reason was that in 1996, the Japanese government went in
for infrastructure construction in a large scale in order
to stimulate economic recovery, and public investment promoted
the economic upturn to a certain extent; in the meanwhile,
the tax reduction policy gave an impetus to the growth of
individual consumption by 2.9%, and IT oriented enterprise
investment in equipment experienced an up rush by 11.3%.
However, as a result of overoptimistic estimation on the
economic situation, the growth due to policy was misunderstood
as normal recovery and entrance into a booming phase, and
several economic reform programs were promulgated to cause
the economic recession in 1997 because of over-dosage.
In contrast, the current economic cycle has shown that the
recovery phase lasted only 16 months, shorter than the previous
one, and hardly had the economy entered into the booming
phase when it slumped into recession again, a rare case
among all post-war economic cycles. "The economic situation
in Japan is rather grim."
15.2 The business operation of Japanese enterprises is drastically
worsening
The operating profits of listed enterprise groups in the
first half of 2001 dropped by a large margin. Operating
achievements of 662 listed Japanese enterprise groups as
settled in the middle of 2001 (by the end of September)
most recently published indicated that the turnover of enterprises
increased by 0.4% over the same period of the preceding
year, the profits of current accounts decreased by 45.1%
and the after-tax profits decreased by 51.3%. The year-end
turnover was expected to decrease by 1.6%, the profits of
current accounts to decrease by 45.1% and the after-tax
profits to decrease by 48.3%.
Manufacturing industries and non-manufacturing industries
other than the banking sector faced more or less the same
situation of business operation in the first half of 2001.
Both experienced a decrease in profits of current accounts
by 46.4% and 44.01% respectively over the same period of
the preceding year, and a decrease in after-tax profits
by 51.9% and 49.4% respectively. By the end of 2001, the
profits of current accounts and after-tax profits of manufacturing
enterprises would have decreased by 49.2% and 54.3% respectively,
and those of non-manufacturing enterprises would have decreased
by 27.8% and 25.8% respectively. Of the 17 industries in
the manufacturing sector, 11 suffered profit decrease and
incurred a financial deficit. 84 enterprises in household
appliances, of which the profit for the first quarter of
the year was in positive figure, incurred a financial deficit
as high as 260 Yen billion for the first half of the year,
and thus came to be known by public opinion as the "earthquake
focus" of the worsening operating condition of manufacturing
industries and of all Japanese industries at large. This
was mainly attributable to excessive investment in semi-conductor
and liquid crystal production. While the IT industry was
confronted with frustration, such investment did not translate
itself into economic benefits; on the contrary, it turned
out to be heavy burdens.
As a result of dull domestic demand in Japan, the economy
has been long in stagnation, and Japanese enterprises have
had to seek opportunity of development overseas one after
another over the recent years. This phenomenon has made
home industries hollowing out of Japan, adding to the pressure
of domestic structural reform. The overseas output value
of Japanese enterprises has accounted for 23% of the total
national output value, a record high up to now. By the year
2004 the overseas output value is expected to account for
over 30%. According to an investigation by the International
Cooperation Bank, Japanese enterprises set up around 1000
factories and plants in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and
the Philippines in the year 2001. The tendency for Japanese
enterprises to gradually shift their operating focus to
overseas has attracted attention of authorities concerned.
The New Growth Group of the Japanese Industrial Structure
Examination Commission recently forwarded a report which
points out that the accelerated transfer of Japanese enterprises
especially to Asian countries will lead to reduction in
opportunities of employment in Japan and hollowing out of
domestic industries and technology. As estimated by this
department, if such tendency is allowed to continue, the
surplus of current accounts in Japan will decrease by a
large margin and during the period from 2006 to 2010, the
otherwise likely c.a. 3% of economic growth rate of Japan
will remain at the level of 0.5% while the rate of unemployment
will reach above 5%. As a matter of fact, influenced by
the global economic sliding after the September 11 terrorist
attack, the situation of employment in Japan has worsening
and the rate of full unemployment might continue to rise
after hitting a record low of 5.3% in September.
1.5.3 The social demand further decreases
It can be seen from some other important economic indexes
published by the Japanese Cabinet during the same period
that the household expenditure in April 2001 was reduced
by as much as 4.5% as compared with the same period of the
preceding year. This is mainly because the employment situation
became rigorous (with the rate of unemployment up to 4.8%)
and the income expectancy is not optimistic, resulting in
an decrease of 19.3% and 26.8% respectively in education
and automobile expenditures; on the other hand, traffic
and communication expenditures decreased by 7.5% over the
same period of the preceding year. The industrial production
in Japan in April decreased by 1.7% over the previous month,
of which the production of electrical appliances and machinery
decrease by 6.1% as a result of significant reduction in
the demand of cellular phones, computers and electronic
spare parts. Mechanical Equipment Orders, an index to reflect
the investment situation from June to September, also decreased
by 7.0% in the period of January to March as compared with
the same period of the preceding year. Reduction in production
caused a decrease of enterprises' investment in equipment
and influences employees' income, which in turn resulted
in a decrease in consumption, and the social demand was
further reduced, thus making the next round of social and
economic activities more tightened. Generally speaking,
the economic retrenchment will continue until the end of
overstock adjustment, and production of enterprises will
step into the growing track again; economic recession ends
and a new economic cycle begins.
1.5.4 Overall evaluation of Japan's current economic development
On the whole, the current economic recession in Japan is
rigorous but comparatively not extremely so. In the first
place, although recovery was weak and no booming phase appeared,
the whole decade with exception of 1996 witnessed a continuously
weak economic development with consumption at a low ebb;
so this current recession was just a process from an economic
growth of 1.2% in 2000 to further slowdown of growth in
2001 and 2002, and the recession was not felt so keenly
as that during 1997 and 1998. Secondly, after taking office,
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has vigorously
advocated carrying out drastic reform with an intention
to thoroughly settle the various complicated problems existing
in Japan's economic, social and even political fields. The
bold reforms for settling all these problems will surely
affect the economic booming. Reform requires that overall
consideration be given to the economic growth, stable employment
and social stability however, it is hard for measures of
reform to cater to all factors and the unknowable will catch
you unprepared; what is more, the execution of reform will
surely involve various interest groups in all aspects, for
instance, the reform in the postal undertaking and the public
investment system will touch upon the economic foundation
of the Liberal Democratic Party; social security reform
system will relate to the stability of citizens' life; banking
reform and bad bonds settlement might involve the interest
of high-ranking bank officials and relevant enterprises
in debt. It is, therefore, unpredictable whether the reform
can achieve the optimum dual objectives of "eforming
and growth" in the near future. Given such situation,
people will not generally have high expectancy of Japan's
economic growth, and it would not be easy to even maintain
a slight growth through efforts.
Japan's economy is such a case that "ngrained habits
are hard to change" and the course of reform will not
be smooth. The cycle of economy and the reform will take
place in a staggered fashion. It is impossible to evaluate
Japan's economy by viewing the economic cycles alone; rather,
greater attention should be paid to its policy reform, new
development strategy and the result of the policy and strategy.
In any case, drastic reform in Japan's economy is after
all a positive aspect of development. Japan is the second
largest economy in the world which is closely related to
the economy and trade of the whole Asia. In the long run,
the positive effect of the drastic reform of Japan's economy
on Asian and global economy will be revealed progressively.
|